Intended contributors
- Nicole Katzir (Radboud University)
- Natalia Levshina (Radboud University)
- Christine Elsweiler (University of Innsbruck)
- Reyhan Didem Leblebici (European University Viadrina)
- Géraldine Bengsch (University of the West Indies)
- Leigh Clark (Bold Insight / UCD)
- Vittorio Tantucci (Lancaster University)
- Miriam Lind (European University Viadrina)
- Jana Junge (European University Viadrina)
References
- Andersson, Marta. 2025. Companionship in code: AI’s role in the future of human connection. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12, 1177.
- Andersson, Marta, and Dan McIntyre. 2025. Can ChatGPT recognize impoliteness? An exploratory study of the pragmatic awareness of a large language model. Journal of Pragmatics.
- Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614.
- Elsweiler, Christine, Andreas Ziegner, and David Elsweiler. 2026. From hyperpolite to hyperefficient: A continuum of user politeness in human–GenAI interactions. Corpus Pragmatics 10, 24.
- Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills. 2013. Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. Journal of Pragmatics 58: 1–11.
- Hu, Peiyao, et al. 2026. Do you say “please” to ChatGPT? Investigation of user perceptions of AI consciousness and their politeness performance in human-chatbot conversations.
- Kirk, Hannah Rose, Iason Gabriel, Christopher Summerfield, et al. 2025. Why human–AI relationships need socioaffective alignment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12, 728.
- Lazebnik, Teddy, Lior Zalmanson, and Osnat Mokryn. 2025. Mind your manners: The dynamics of politeness in human-AI vs. human-human interactions.
- Locher, Miriam A. 2013. Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 58: 145–149.
- Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33.